Notes on Attic Tribes in the case of Neaira

Transcription - Page 3

3
excluded the boy by vote and
would not enrol him, among
themselves". (Neaer 77).
This shows (a) the intention of
είοαγεη the enrolment.'
(b) What seems important - a
distinction seems to be made between
[Greek script (= phratros)
and [Greek script]. But that the Brulididas
were not phratores together but that they
had phatores beyond themselves. For
if there be no real distinction, we have
here a piece of men tautology of which
the orator (whoever he was) would never
have been guilty In my opinion
we have here both phratria + genos. The
candidate for enrolment must
be brought before both, for the larger
aggregation is concerned as well as
the smaller + must guard against
unlawful introductions. So here we
have another matter for investigation
-"What was the process - the entire process
of enolmernt? I traced [Greek Script]
to one of Isaeas speeches also.
(3) Now mark the following passage: -
[Greek script 7 lines]
(Neaer 17)